In
terms of
structural
and durability requirements, SCC is not different from conventional
vibrated
concrete and therefore existing design codes and standards are still
valid.
The
self-compacting concrete differs
from conventional concrete in the following
three characteristic features, namely, appropriate flowability, non-segregation,
and no blocking tendency.
An increase in the flowability of
concrete is known to increase the risk of segregation. Therefore, it is
essential to have proper mix design.
The
basic constituent materials used in SCC are essentially the same as
those of
conventional concrete, although additional admixtures or fine materials
may be
necessary to achieve the required rheological properties. However, the biggest
difference between the two concretes is the actual proportioning of
these
materials.
In
order to achieve its defined purpose, SCC
mixes contain:
¶
Lower
coarse aggregate contents: to reduce the friction between
them and therefore
enhance the overall concrete fluidity
¶
Higher
amounts of sand & higher amounts of cementitious materials
including
Portland cement: to further increase fluidity as well as
enhance its
cohesiveness and resistance to segregation and viscosity.
¶
Lower
water/cementitious material ratio,
¶
Higher
superplasticiser doses and
¶
Viscosity
modifying admixtures
Control
of the viscosity and cohesiveness of the paste ensures the flow of the
SCC
through obstacles such as steel reinforcement without any aggregate
blockages.
Comparison :
Typical SCC vs Conventional Concrete Mix
| Material,
by volume |
Conventional
Vibrated Concrete (%) |
SCC
(%) |
|
Admixtures
|
<
0.01 |
0.01
|
| Water
|
18
|
20
|
| Coarse Aggregate
|
46
|
28
|
| Sand
|
24
|
34
|
| Fines,
including Portland cement |
12
|
18
|